PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVSE vs. QMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVSE vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVSE vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.00%10.14%19.11%13.35%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
1.87%10.89%16.11%22.19%

Returns By Period


CVSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
10Y*

QMAR

1D
2.41%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.87%
6M
4.47%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVSE vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVSE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVSE vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSE
CVSE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAR
QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVSE vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVSEQMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.43

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

2.27

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.03

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

14.07

-8.71

CVSE vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVSE and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVSEQMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.43

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.76

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between CVSE and QMAR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CVSE vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

CVSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
CVSE
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
0.59%0.81%1.05%1.22%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CVSE vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSE drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSE and QMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSEQMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-19.83%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-9.23%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.88%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-3.40%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.33%

+1.02%

Volatility

CVSE vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) is 0.00%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that CVSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVSEQMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.50%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

4.62%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

13.25%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

14.05%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

14.03%

+0.22%