CVSB vs. SPTU
CVSB (Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CVSB is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVSB charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
CVSB vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CVSB having a 1.49% return and SPTU slightly lower at 1.48%.
CVSB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSB vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 1.49% | 1.13% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVSB and SPTU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVSB vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
CVSB
SPTU
CVSB vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVSB | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.15 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 81.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVSB | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.14 | 11.88 | -7.74 |
Drawdowns
CVSB vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSB and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVSB | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.04% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.00% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility
CVSB vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVSB | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 0.32% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 0.32% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 0.32% | +1.00% |
CVSB vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVSB vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 4.37% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVSB and SPTU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for CVSB.
CVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: Calvert and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for CVSB and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for CVSB and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer