PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVSA vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVSA vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Covista Inc. (CVSA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVSA achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CVSA has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 17.86%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.49% annualized return.


CVSA

1D
0.62%
1M
-6.70%
6M
-4.49%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
0.63%
3Y*
38.38%
5Y*
26.67%
10Y*
17.86%
ALL TIME*
14.48%

MSFT

1D
0.03%
1M
8.18%
6M
-17.72%
YTD
-20.72%
1Y
-25.10%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
22.49%
ALL TIME*
24.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$44.54M$47.91M$41.08M
$11.81B$16.07B$15.66B

CVSA vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVSA
Covista Inc.
11.96%13.89%54.11%66.06%20.09%-12.93%-2.92%-26.10%12.53%34.78%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-20.72%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CVSA and MSFT is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1991

0.22

The correlation between CVSA and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CVSA:

$3.94B

MSFT:

$2.84T

EPS

CVSA:

$6.95

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

CVSA:

16.66

MSFT:

22.73

PEG Ratio

CVSA:

0.54

MSFT:

1.59

PS Ratio

CVSA:

2.18

MSFT:

8.94

PB Ratio

CVSA:

2.95

MSFT:

6.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVSA:

$1.91B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVSA:

$1.11B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVSA:

$431.35M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVSA vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSA
CVSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CVSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CVSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVSA vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Covista Inc. (CVSA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVSAMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.86

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.72

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

-1.30

+1.35

CVSA vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVSA and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVSA vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSA drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSA and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVSAMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.26%

-69.38%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.14%

-34.50%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.14%

-34.50%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.23%

-37.15%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

-37.15%

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.00%

-29.14%

+4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-21.80%

-8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.99%

19.07%

+5.92%

Volatility

CVSA vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Covista Inc. (CVSA) has a higher volatility of 16.75% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.82%. This indicates that CVSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVSAMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.75%

9.82%

+6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

24.50%

+7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.57%

27.61%

+21.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.54%

27.08%

+15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.61%

27.16%

+12.45%

Dividends

CVSA vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CVSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVSA
Covista Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.42%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

CVSA vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Covista Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CVSA vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Covista Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

Portfolio components
CVSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Covista Inc. reported a gross profit of 290.93M and revenue of 487.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

CVSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Covista Inc. reported an operating income of 92.21M and revenue of 487.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.9%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

CVSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Covista Inc. reported a net income of 57.98M and revenue of 487.03M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVSA and MSFT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVSA has higher volatility (16.75%) compared to MSFT (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVSA dropped -77.26% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

CVSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVSA and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer