CVMIX vs. CTTLX
CVMIX (Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and CTTLX (Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CVMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CTTLX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX returned 11.54%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for CTTLX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVMIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CTTLX.
Performance
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMIX achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than CTTLX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CVMIX has outperformed CTTLX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while CTTLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.
CVMIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 35.32%
- 6M
- 37.29%
- 1Y
- 64.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
CTTLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 35.32% | 36.77% | 6.37% | 4.74% | -22.57% | -7.43% | 24.88% | 22.65% | -15.23% | 44.71% |
CTTLX Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund | 1.69% | 5.18% | 1.93% | 5.00% | -8.48% | 0.20% | 4.38% | 7.45% | 0.54% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMIX and CTTLX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CVMIX and CTTLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVMIX vs. CTTLX — Risk / Return Rank
CVMIX
CTTLX
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) and Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVMIX | CTTLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.67 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 2.46 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 8.40 | +8.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than CTTLX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMIX and CTTLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMIX | CTTLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -13.21% | -30.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -2.94% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.48% | -5.67% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.99% | -13.21% | -26.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.96% | -13.21% | -30.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.47% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -2.02% | -12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 0.86% | +2.88% |
Volatility
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund (CVMIX) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) at 0.76%. This indicates that CVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVMIX | CTTLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 0.76% | +11.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 2.02% | +18.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 2.62% | +19.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 3.71% | +15.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 3.83% | +14.90% |
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CTTLX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVMIX vs. CTTLX - Dividend Comparison
CVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CTTLX's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTTLX Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund | 3.14% | 3.99% | 3.29% | 2.21% | 1.43% | 1.04% | 1.43% | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.71% | 2.62% |
CVMIX Calvert Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.67% | 2.26% | 0.63% | 0.92% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.68% | 1.24% | 0.27% | 0.84% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVMIX and CTTLX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVMIX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to CTTLX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMIX dropped -43.96% vs CTTLX's -13.21%.
CVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVMIX and CTTLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer