CVLOX vs. GLBIX
CVLOX (Calamos Global Opportunities Fund) and GLBIX (Leuthold Global Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, CVLOX returned 11.82%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for GLBIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVLOX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for GLBIX.
Performance
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLOX achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than GLBIX's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CVLOX has outperformed GLBIX with an annualized return of 11.82%, while GLBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.13% annualized return.
CVLOX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
GLBIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLOX Calamos Global Opportunities Fund | 18.19% | 15.84% | 23.81% | 13.88% | -22.17% | 15.72% | 31.76% | 18.28% | -9.88% | 20.04% |
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund | 15.78% | 17.72% | 1.08% | 8.32% | -7.91% | 15.01% | 7.52% | 9.36% | -12.85% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLOX and GLBIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CVLOX and GLBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLOX vs. GLBIX — Risk / Return Rank
CVLOX
GLBIX
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) and Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVLOX | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.60 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.36 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 15.38 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLOX drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, which is greater than GLBIX's maximum drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLOX and GLBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLOX | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.61% | -26.82% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -6.39% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -6.39% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -16.14% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | -26.82% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -4.85% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 1.81% | +0.89% |
Volatility
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) at 4.04%. This indicates that CVLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLOX | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 4.04% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 7.78% | +5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 9.09% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 9.15% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 9.65% | +5.21% |
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVLOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GLBIX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVLOX vs. GLBIX - Dividend Comparison
CVLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, less than GLBIX's 8.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLOX Calamos Global Opportunities Fund | 7.63% | 9.10% | 8.15% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 5.71% | 6.11% | 1.28% | 12.65% | 6.04% | 0.68% | 1.28% |
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund | 8.39% | 9.71% | 8.31% | 2.52% | 5.18% | 1.89% | 0.25% | 1.04% | 8.48% | 9.31% | 9.66% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVLOX and GLBIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVLOX has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to GLBIX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLOX dropped -46.61% vs GLBIX's -26.82%.
GLBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVLOX and GLBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer