PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLOX vs. CGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLOX vs. CGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLOX achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than CGO's 24.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CVLOX having a 11.82% annualized return and CGO not far ahead at 12.38%.


CVLOX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.45%
YTD
18.19%
6M
17.01%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
11.82%

CGO

1D
-1.93%
1M
1.72%
YTD
24.25%
6M
23.70%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLOX vs. CGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
18.19%15.84%23.81%13.88%-22.17%15.72%31.76%18.28%-9.88%20.04%
CGO
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
24.25%8.87%36.81%14.03%-36.60%13.04%20.87%45.08%-26.14%56.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLOX and CGO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005

0.56

The correlation between CVLOX and CGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (10 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLOX vs. CGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLOX
CVLOX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CVLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CGO
CGO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLOX vs. CGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVLOXCGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.07

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

7.11

+3.82

CVLOX vs. CGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the CGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLOX and CGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVLOX vs. CGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLOX drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, smaller than the maximum CGO drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLOX and CGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLOXCGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-60.03%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-15.24%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-26.70%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-43.69%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

-50.89%

+20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-2.25%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-11.54%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

4.42%

-1.72%

Volatility

CVLOX vs. CGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) is 5.93%, while Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that CVLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLOXCGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

6.97%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

14.14%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

16.69%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

20.51%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

24.74%

-9.88%

CVLOX vs. CGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CGO's 2.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVLOX vs. CGO - Dividend Comparison

CVLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than CGO's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGO
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
7.00%8.43%8.43%10.57%12.68%7.80%8.18%8.96%11.81%7.97%11.40%10.51%
CVLOX
Calamos Global Opportunities Fund
7.63%9.10%8.15%0.61%0.00%5.71%6.11%1.28%12.65%6.04%0.68%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVLOX and CGO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGO has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to CVLOX (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLOX dropped -46.61% vs CGO's -60.03%.

CVLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLOX and CGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer