CVD.TO vs. TLN
CVD.TO (iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Convertible Bond Index, while TLN (Talen Energy Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, CVD.TO returned 7.61% vs 50.50% for TLN. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CVD.TO is traded in CAD, while TLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVD.TO achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than TLN's 2.56% return.
CVD.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 7.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
TLN
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 50.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVD.TO iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF | 3.23% | 7.09% | 12.68% | 0.86% |
TLN Talen Energy Corporation | 2.56% | 77.52% | 241.84% | 35.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVD.TO and TLN is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2023 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVD.TO vs. TLN — Risk / Return Rank
CVD.TO
TLN
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVD.TO | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.52 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 3.09 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVD.TO | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 2.11 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum TLN drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVD.TO and TLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVD.TO | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -33.43% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.95% | -33.28% | +29.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -33.43% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -15.33% | +13.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -7.47% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 16.41% | -15.05% |
Volatility
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) is 0.95%, while Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) has a volatility of 18.15%. This indicates that CVD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVD.TO | TLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 18.15% | -17.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.52% | 41.33% | -35.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29% | 56.18% | -48.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 49.52% | -40.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.43% | 49.52% | -40.09% |
Dividends
CVD.TO vs. TLN - Dividend Comparison
CVD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while TLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVD.TO iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF | 4.95% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.33% | 5.05% | 4.61% | 4.48% | 4.52% | 4.97% | 4.65% | 4.51% | 4.94% |
TLN Talen Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVD.TO and TLN have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CVD.TO and TLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer