PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVD.TO vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CVD.TO is traded in CAD, while HWM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HWM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVD.TO achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CVD.TO has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 4.53%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 32.81% annualized return.


CVD.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.23%
6M
0.06%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
4.53%

HWM

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.84%
YTD
22.94%
6M
27.60%
1Y
46.23%
3Y*
79.18%
5Y*
52.51%
10Y*
32.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF
3.23%7.09%12.68%3.64%-4.63%5.33%3.67%10.28%-2.68%4.06%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
22.94%79.33%120.12%34.80%33.01%10.66%18.98%74.52%-32.12%38.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CVD.TO and HWM is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011

0.10

The correlation between CVD.TO and HWM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVD.TO vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVD.TO
CVD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVD.TOHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.24

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

8.34

-2.72

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVD.TO and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVD.TOHWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.51

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.73

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Drawdowns

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVD.TO and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVD.TOHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-61.76%

+38.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-14.35%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-19.44%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.62%

-19.44%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

-61.42%

+37.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-7.70%

+5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-22.56%

+20.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

5.56%

-4.20%

Volatility

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) is 0.95%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that CVD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVD.TOHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

11.34%

-10.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.52%

23.98%

-18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

30.68%

-23.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

30.50%

-21.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.43%

38.09%

-28.66%

Dividends

CVD.TO vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

CVD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than HWM's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF
4.95%4.91%5.14%5.33%5.05%4.61%4.48%4.52%4.97%4.65%4.51%4.94%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.19%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVD.TO and HWM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVD.TO and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer