PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVAR vs. DVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVAR vs. DVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVAR achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DVLU's 10.31% return.


CVAR

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.62%
6M
2.14%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
10Y*

DVLU

1D
-0.22%
1M
3.99%
YTD
10.31%
6M
12.01%
1Y
35.76%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVAR vs. DVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
0.62%14.95%3.12%11.74%-5.03%0.71%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
10.31%23.67%13.36%18.84%-9.73%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CVAR and DVLU is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021

0.75

The correlation between CVAR and DVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVAR vs. DVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVAR
CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVAR vs. DVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVARDVLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

2.19

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

3.03

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.93

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.45

10.59

-7.14

CVAR vs. DVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the DVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVAR and DVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVARDVLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.19

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.42

-0.06

Drawdowns

CVAR vs. DVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVAR drawdown since its inception was -19.39%, smaller than the maximum DVLU drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAR and DVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVARDVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.39%

-53.26%

+33.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-12.24%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-24.86%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-0.22%

-6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-8.78%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.39%

+0.07%

Volatility

CVAR vs. DVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cultivar ETF (CVAR) is 2.24%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that CVAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVARDVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

3.65%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

12.36%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

16.40%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

21.52%

-6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

25.81%

-10.34%

CVAR vs. DVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVAR has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DVLU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVAR vs. DVLU - Dividend Comparison

CVAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than DVLU's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
1.52%1.53%3.57%1.41%5.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.62%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVAR and DVLU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVLU has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to CVAR (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVAR dropped -19.39% vs DVLU's -53.26%.

On 3-year performance, DVLU leads with 22.18% vs 8.39% for CVAR. On fees, DVLU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CVAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DVLU has performed better with a 22.18% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVLU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CVAR.

CVAR has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.62% for DVLU.

CVAR is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DVLU is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Cultivar and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for CVAR and 0.60% for DVLU.

DVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVAR and DVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer