CVAAX vs. CTSIX
CVAAX (Calamos Select Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CVAAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Calamos, while CTSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Calamos. Over the past 5 years, CVAAX returned 11.05%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for CTSIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVAAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.
Performance
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVAAX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 37.63% return.
CVAAX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
CTSIX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 37.63%
- 6M
- 34.34%
- 1Y
- 67.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- —
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVAAX Calamos Select Fund | 4.53% | 15.03% | 24.08% | 26.48% | -18.83% | 24.78% | 16.33% | 12.29% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 37.63% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVAAX and CTSIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CVAAX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVAAX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
CVAAX
CTSIX
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Select Fund (CVAAX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVAAX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 5.75 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 22.69 | -16.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVAAX drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than CTSIX's maximum drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVAAX and CTSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVAAX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -50.83% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -12.38% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -28.40% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.13% | -50.60% | +26.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | 0.00% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -20.49% | +12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.13% | -0.04% |
Volatility
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Select Fund (CVAAX) is 4.52%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that CVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVAAX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 11.67% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 23.15% | -13.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 29.38% | -16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 28.33% | -11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 29.92% | -11.56% |
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVAAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVAAX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison
CVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVAAX Calamos Select Fund | 5.23% | 5.47% | 7.56% | 4.15% | 2.73% | 7.84% | 4.85% | 0.60% | 18.86% | 3.08% | 0.71% | 7.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVAAX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTSIX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to CVAAX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVAAX dropped -55.70% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.
CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVAAX and CTSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer