CUSDX vs. SEMRX
CUSDX (Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund) and SEMRX (Semper Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CUSDX returned 3.01%/yr vs 4.82%/yr for SEMRX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUSDX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SEMRX.
Performance
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUSDX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than SEMRX's 2.15% return.
CUSDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SEMRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.40%
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 1.42% | 3.64% | 5.96% | 5.13% | -0.64% | 0.04% | 2.06% | 0.87% | -0.30% |
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund | 2.15% | 6.47% | 8.21% | 8.76% | -1.69% | 1.93% | -1.19% | 3.48% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUSDX and SEMRX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CUSDX and SEMRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUSDX vs. SEMRX — Risk / Return Rank
CUSDX
SEMRX
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) and Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUSDX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.02 | 3.05 | +0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.98 | 11.44 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.60 | 47.40 | +10.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUSDX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.80 | 3.19 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.98 | 2.64 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 1.27 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUSDX drawdown since its inception was -1.99%, smaller than the maximum SEMRX drawdown of -13.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSDX and SEMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUSDX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -13.09% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | -0.52% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.80% | -0.63% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.99% | -4.05% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -0.63% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.13% | -0.05% |
Volatility
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) is 0.23%, while Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that CUSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUSDX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 0.48% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | 1.27% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91% | 1.87% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.02% | 1.83% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 2.31% | -1.36% |
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUSDX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMRX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUSDX vs. SEMRX - Dividend Comparison
CUSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than SEMRX's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 4.15% | 3.28% | 4.76% | 3.25% | 1.70% | 0.84% | 1.63% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund | 5.67% | 5.94% | 6.13% | 6.05% | 3.22% | 1.71% | 1.95% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.20% | 3.03% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUSDX and SEMRX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEMRX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to CUSDX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSDX dropped -1.99% vs SEMRX's -13.09%.
CUSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUSDX and SEMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer