CUKX.L vs. LUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) is fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index, while LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CUKX.L returned 15.22%/yr vs 39.37%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CUKX.L is traded in GBp, while LUNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LUNR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.85% return.

CUKX.L

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 21.65%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

LUNR

• 1D: -13.04%
• 1M: -24.74%
• YTD: 64.85%
• 6M: 121.84%
• 1Y: 148.32%
• 3Y*: 39.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	7.04%	25.78%	9.30%	7.72%	4.97%	1.05%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.85%	-16.99%	623.18%	-75.73%	16.07%	-0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKX.L and LUNR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.05

Return for Risk

CUKX.L vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUKX.L

CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CUKX.L	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.36	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.27	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.27	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.59	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	7.53	+0.46

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKX.L and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUKX.L	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.50%	-97.56%	+63.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-41.62%	+32.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-78.29%	+65.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-70.83%	+67.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-64.78%	+60.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	19.77%	-17.07%

Volatility

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) is 3.63%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.53%. This indicates that CUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUKX.L	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	42.53%	-38.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	92.39%	-82.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.06%	110.12%	-99.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.73%	171.63%	-158.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	171.63%	-156.55%

Dividends

CUKX.L vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CUKX.L nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CUKX.L and LUNR in my portfolio?

CUKX.L and LUNR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.