PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUKX.L vs. INPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and International Public Partnership (INPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than INPP.L's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKX.L has outperformed INPP.L with an annualized return of 9.06%, while INPP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.64% annualized return.


CUKX.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.86%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
9.06%

INPP.L

1D
1.18%
1M
3.48%
YTD
12.92%
6M
13.10%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.86%25.78%9.30%7.72%4.97%17.48%-11.28%17.23%-9.05%12.45%
INPP.L
International Public Partnership
12.92%10.96%-5.78%-3.94%-6.64%4.40%6.89%13.85%2.42%6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKX.L and INPP.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2010

0.22

The correlation between CUKX.L and INPP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUKX.L
CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

INPP.L
INPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
INPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
INPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and International Public Partnership (INPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUKX.LINPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.77

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

8.22

-0.01

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the INPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKX.L and INPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUKX.LINPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.47

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.09

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.27

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.11

Drawdowns

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, which is greater than INPP.L's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and INPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUKX.LINPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-32.28%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-7.61%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-17.28%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

-27.01%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-27.01%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

0.00%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-5.39%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.57%

+0.05%

Volatility

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) is 4.08%, while International Public Partnership (INPP.L) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that CUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUKX.LINPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.50%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

10.53%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

14.37%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

18.23%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

16.94%

-1.86%

Dividends

CUKX.L vs. INPP.L - Dividend Comparison

CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INPP.L
International Public Partnership
6.27%6.77%6.81%5.77%5.04%4.39%4.27%4.25%4.51%4.30%4.25%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUKX.L and INPP.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUKX.L and INPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer