PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CUKX.L is traded in GBp, while IBTU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBTU.L's 1.75% return.


CUKX.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.86%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
9.06%

IBTU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
2.09%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.86%25.78%9.30%7.72%4.97%17.48%-11.28%9.12%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.80%-3.07%7.07%-0.29%13.11%0.93%-2.00%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKX.L and IBTU.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUKX.L
CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUKX.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.96

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

2.62

+5.59

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKX.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUKX.LIBTU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

0.75

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.53

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.27

+0.27

Drawdowns

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUKX.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-19.01%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-5.12%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-9.80%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

-15.91%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

-6.09%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-9.25%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.88%

+0.74%

Volatility

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 1.77%. This indicates that CUKX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUKX.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

1.77%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

4.96%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

6.55%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

8.45%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

8.76%

+6.32%

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CUKX.L and IBTU.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CUKX.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUKX.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CUKX.L and IBTU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

CUKX.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUKX.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer