CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L
CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CUKX.L is a fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index, while FLOA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CUKX.L returned 12.40%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for FLOA.L. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUKX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CUKX.L is traded in GBp, while FLOA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUKX.L achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than FLOA.L's 3.02% return.
CUKX.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 7.84% | 25.78% | 9.30% | 7.72% | 4.97% | 17.48% | -11.28% | 17.23% | -1.79% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.07% | -2.58% | 8.28% | 1.32% | 13.40% | 1.37% | -2.10% | 0.21% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUKX.L and FLOA.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CUKX.L
FLOA.L
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUKX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.12 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.93 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 2.62 | +5.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKX.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUKX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.50% | -14.83% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -4.95% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -9.63% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.88% | -14.83% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -2.72% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -5.93% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.76% | +1.04% |
Volatility
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 1.80%. This indicates that CUKX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUKX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 1.80% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 5.10% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 6.81% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 8.64% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 9.22% | +5.67% |
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CUKX.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CUKX.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUKX.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for FLOA.L.
CUKX.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CUKX.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for CUKX.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer