PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKS.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKS.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 4.74%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


CUKS.L

1D
0.83%
1M
3.18%
YTD
3.10%
6M
5.37%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
4.74%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUKS.L
iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.10%14.90%5.74%9.76%-22.81%14.33%-6.24%29.73%-15.36%20.13%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKS.L and LCPE.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.30

The correlation between CUKS.L and LCPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CUKS.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

24.0%

-

Industrials

21.1%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
1.9%

Real Estate

9.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

6.6%
32.3%

Communication Services

6.2%
0.0%

Technology

4.2%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
32.8%

Energy

3.3%
0.0%

Healthcare

3.3%
32.6%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Financial Services

CUKS.L
24.0%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

CUKS.L
21.1%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CUKS.L
15.3%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Real Estate

CUKS.L
9.0%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

CUKS.L
6.6%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Communication Services

CUKS.L
6.2%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Technology

CUKS.L
4.2%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

CUKS.L
4.1%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Energy

CUKS.L
3.3%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Healthcare

CUKS.L
3.3%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Utilities

CUKS.L
3.0%
LCPE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUKS.L
CUKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUKS.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

4.13

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

13.66

-10.87

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKS.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUKS.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.44

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

1.04

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

1.20

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.98

-0.51

Drawdowns

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.42%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKS.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUKS.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.42%

-27.05%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-6.66%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-12.39%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.35%

-12.39%

-22.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-27.05%

-15.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-2.71%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-3.52%

-5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.02%

+1.78%

Volatility

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that CUKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUKS.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.81%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

8.48%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

11.29%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.74%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

20.60%

-3.58%

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUKS.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUKS.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CUKS.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CUKS.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CUKS.L is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CUKS.L is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

CUKS.L tracks FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CUKS.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUKS.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer