CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CUKS.L (iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and JRDZ.L (JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - CUKS.L tracks the FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP while JRDZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CUKS.L returned 10.62% vs 22.17% for JRDZ.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUKS.L charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JRDZ.L.

Performance

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKS.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than JRDZ.L's 8.20% return.

CUKS.L

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 10.62%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: 4.74%

JRDZ.L

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 22.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CUKS.L iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)	3.10%	14.90%	-1.09%
JRDZ.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)	8.20%	31.47%	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKS.L and JRDZ.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024	0.19

Return for Risk

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUKS.L

CUKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CUKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CUKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CUKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CUKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

JRDZ.L

JRDZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
JRDZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CUKS.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	6.59	-5.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	9.28	-8.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	2.16	-1.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	32.94	-32.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	83.74	-80.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKS.L and JRDZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CUKS.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	6.59	-5.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	7.14	-6.67

Drawdowns

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.42%, which is greater than JRDZ.L's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKS.L and JRDZ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUKS.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.42%	-4.00%	-38.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-4.00%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-0.05%	-3.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-1.05%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	—	—

Volatility

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) is 4.14%, while JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that CUKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUKS.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	4.56%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.40%	20.18%	-6.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	23.37%	-7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	23.37%	-6.35%

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUKS.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUKS.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

CUKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CUKS.L iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JRDZ.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)	2.29%	2.55%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CUKS.L and JRDZ.L in my portfolio?

CUKS.L and JRDZ.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CUKS.L or JRDZ.L?

On fees, JRDZ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CUKS.L or JRDZ.L?

JRDZ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CUKS.L.

What is the main difference between CUKS.L and JRDZ.L?

CUKS.L tracks FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while JRDZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CUKS.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.