PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CUKS.L (iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CUKS.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while IEEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUKS.L returned 4.74%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for IEEM.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUKS.L charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IEEM.L.

Performance

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUKS.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than IEEM.L's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CUKS.L has underperformed IEEM.L with an annualized return of 4.74%, while IEEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.

CUKS.L

1D
0.83%
1M
3.18%
YTD
3.10%
6M
5.37%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
4.74%

IEEM.L

1D
-1.34%
1M
6.63%
YTD
25.90%
6M
28.05%
1Y
55.14%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUKS.L
iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)		3.10%14.90%5.74%9.76%-22.81%14.33%-6.24%29.73%-15.36%20.13%
IEEM.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)		25.90%26.66%9.88%3.86%-9.90%-1.38%15.96%12.64%-9.08%25.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CUKS.L and IEEM.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.45

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CUKS.L
IEEM.L

Financial Services

24.0%
19.5%

Industrials

21.1%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
9.5%

Real Estate

9.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
6.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
6.9%

Technology

4.2%
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.0%

Energy

3.3%
4.1%

Healthcare

3.3%
2.9%

Utilities

3.0%
2.1%

Financial Services

CUKS.L
24.0%
IEEM.L
19.5%

Industrials

CUKS.L
21.1%
IEEM.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CUKS.L
15.3%
IEEM.L
9.5%

Real Estate

CUKS.L
9.0%
IEEM.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

CUKS.L
6.6%
IEEM.L
6.5%

Communication Services

CUKS.L
6.2%
IEEM.L
6.9%

Technology

CUKS.L
4.2%
IEEM.L
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

CUKS.L
4.1%
IEEM.L
3.0%

Energy

CUKS.L
3.3%
IEEM.L
4.1%

Healthcare

CUKS.L
3.3%
IEEM.L
2.9%

Utilities

CUKS.L
3.0%
IEEM.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)

Often compared with CUKS.L:
CUKS.L vs. VMIG.LCUKS.L vs. MIDD.LCUKS.L vs. IITU.LCUKS.L vs. AEICUKS.L vs. CUKX.LCUKS.L vs. VUKG.LCUKS.L vs. AVUV
Often compared with IEEM.L:
IEEM.L vs. EIMI.LIEEM.L vs. VFEM.DEIEEM.L vs. HMEF.LIEEM.L vs. ISP6.LIEEM.L vs. 36B5.DEIEEM.L vs. VFEG.LIEEM.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CUKS.L
CUKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
IEEM.L
IEEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CUKS.LIEEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.79
3.23

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.21
4.13

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.60

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

4.93

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

17.58

-14.79

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUKS.L and IEEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CUKS.LIEEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

3.23

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.57

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.64

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Drawdowns

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUKS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.42%, smaller than the maximum IEEM.L drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUKS.L and IEEM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CUKS.LIEEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.42%

-53.22%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-11.12%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-15.47%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.35%

-23.27%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-26.63%

-15.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-2.43%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-10.41%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.13%

+0.67%

Volatility

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CUKS.L) is 4.14%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that CUKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CUKS.LIEEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

7.42%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

14.55%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

17.03%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

16.32%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

18.11%

-1.09%

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUKS.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IEEM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUKS.L vs. IEEM.L - Dividend Comparison

CUKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUKS.L
iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEEM.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)		2.01%2.48%2.86%2.91%3.40%2.74%1.98%2.32%2.51%1.86%2.09%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

CUKS.L and IEEM.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CUKS.L.

CUKS.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IEEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. CUKS.L tracks FTSE Small Cap Ex Invest Trust TR GBP, while IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CUKS.L and 0.18% for IEEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUKS.L and IEEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer