PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUBIX vs. CDHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Flexible Bond Fund (CUBIX) and Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUBIX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than CDHIX's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CUBIX has underperformed CDHIX with an annualized return of 3.83%, while CDHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.


CUBIX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.81%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
3.83%
ALL TIME*
3.79%

CDHIX

1D
3.24%
1M
-1.23%
6M
10.87%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
33.40%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
10.71%
ALL TIME*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CUBIX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
0.13%8.23%6.56%7.24%-4.15%3.82%4.12%7.06%0.43%3.30%
CDHIX
Calvert International Responsible Index Fund
16.93%33.29%5.04%20.03%-19.22%12.57%15.33%24.38%-13.67%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CUBIX and CDHIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.34

The correlation between CUBIX and CDHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (10 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUBIX vs. CDHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CUBIX
CUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CDHIX
CDHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CDHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CDHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Flexible Bond Fund (CUBIX) and Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CUBIXCDHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.50

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

9.25

-2.78

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the CDHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUBIX and CDHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUBIX drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum CDHIX drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBIX and CDHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CUBIXCDHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-32.32%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-12.61%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.26%

-13.41%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

-32.01%

+24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.12%

-32.32%

+18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-4.07%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-6.27%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

3.40%

-2.79%

Volatility

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Flexible Bond Fund (CUBIX) is 0.77%, while Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that CUBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CUBIXCDHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

6.33%

-5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

16.34%

-13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78%

18.42%

-15.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

16.76%

-13.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.84%

16.46%

-13.62%

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUBIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CDHIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CUBIX vs. CDHIX - Dividend Comparison

CUBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than CDHIX's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDHIX
Calvert International Responsible Index Fund
2.90%3.39%2.87%2.00%1.92%2.00%1.25%1.72%2.25%1.35%2.01%0.00%
CUBIX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
4.51%4.93%5.50%3.95%4.75%3.58%2.85%3.35%3.33%3.41%4.48%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


CUBIX and CDHIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDHIX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to CUBIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUBIX dropped -14.12% vs CDHIX's -32.32%.

CDHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CUBIX and CDHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer