CU71.L vs. XT01.L
CU71.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XT01.L (Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both Government Bonds funds - CU71.L tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index while XT01.L tracks the FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CU71.L returned 1.42%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for XT01.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CU71.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XT01.L.
Performance
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CU71.L is traded in GBp, while XT01.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XT01.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU71.L achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than XT01.L's 1.50% return.
CU71.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
XT01.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU71.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.39% | -0.08% | 3.77% | -1.43% | 1.45% | -1.10% | -5.81% |
XT01.L Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 1.50% | -2.80% | 6.91% | -0.75% | 12.89% | 1.36% | -5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU71.L and XT01.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CU71.L and XT01.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU71.L vs. XT01.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU71.L
XT01.L
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU71.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CU71.L | XT01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.01 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 2.53 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CU71.L | XT01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.70 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.53 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.26 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU71.L drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than XT01.L's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU71.L and XT01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU71.L | XT01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -15.31% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -4.48% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.33% | -9.75% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.69% | -15.31% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | -5.71% | -7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -7.30% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.79% | +0.25% |
Volatility
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU71.L) is 1.45%, while Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that CU71.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XT01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU71.L | XT01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.94% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.32% | 4.68% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.96% | 6.45% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 8.37% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 8.34% | +1.21% |
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU71.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XT01.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CU71.L vs. XT01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CU71.L nor XT01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CU71.L and XT01.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XT01.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XT01.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CU71.L.
CU71.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while XT01.L tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CU71.L and 0.06% for XT01.L.
Find the right allocation for CU71.L and XT01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer