CU31.L vs. TIGB.L
CU31.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and TIGB.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - CU31.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while TIGB.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CU31.L returned 1.49%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for TIGB.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CU31.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TIGB.L.
Performance
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU31.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than TIGB.L's 1.42% return.
CU31.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
TIGB.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU31.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.66% | -1.98% | 5.81% | -1.58% | 9.26% |
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist | 1.42% | 4.10% | 4.94% | 4.27% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU31.L and TIGB.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2022 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU31.L
TIGB.L
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CU31.L | TIGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 2.34 | -1.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 12.51 | -11.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 73.64 | -71.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CU31.L | TIGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 3.87 | -3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 5.48 | -5.20 |
Drawdowns
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU31.L drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than TIGB.L's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU31.L and TIGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU31.L | TIGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -0.50% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -0.30% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.91% | -0.30% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.61% | 0.00% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -0.03% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.05% | +1.73% |
Volatility
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) at 0.45%. This indicates that CU31.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU31.L | TIGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 0.45% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 0.71% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 0.97% | +5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 0.74% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 0.74% | +8.45% |
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU31.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TIGB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CU31.L vs. TIGB.L - Dividend Comparison
CU31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU31.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist | 3.92% | 4.11% | 4.93% | 4.53% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CU31.L and TIGB.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CU31.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CU31.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIGB.L.
CU31.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while TIGB.L is Short-Term Bond. CU31.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while TIGB.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CU31.L and 0.10% for TIGB.L.
Find the right allocation for CU31.L and TIGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer