PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU2U.L achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than UDVD.L's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CU2U.L has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 14.45%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.


CU2U.L

1D
0.43%
1M
6.87%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.81%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
14.45%

UDVD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.81%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CU2U.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
12.35%14.10%19.50%27.09%-20.03%27.37%20.45%31.60%-6.43%21.69%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.99%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.04%0.77%22.66%-3.94%15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CU2U.L and UDVD.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between CU2U.L and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CU2U.L
UDVD.L

Technology

29.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

13.0%
6.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.5%

Industrials

8.4%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
17.0%

Energy

4.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
4.6%

Utilities

2.3%
14.8%

Basic Materials

2.3%
6.4%

Technology

CU2U.L
29.4%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Healthcare

CU2U.L
13.0%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Financial Services

CU2U.L
11.7%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CU2U.L
11.0%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Communication Services

CU2U.L
8.8%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Industrials

CU2U.L
8.4%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

CU2U.L
6.3%
UDVD.L
17.0%

Energy

CU2U.L
4.4%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Real Estate

CU2U.L
2.5%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Utilities

CU2U.L
2.3%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Basic Materials

CU2U.L
2.3%
UDVD.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU2U.L
CU2U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CU2U.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.82

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

4.63

+5.28

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU2U.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CU2U.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.29

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.41

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.56

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.71

+0.18

Drawdowns

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU2U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2U.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CU2U.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-36.12%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-7.06%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-15.26%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.42%

-15.26%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-36.12%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.61%

+3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-3.44%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.78%

+0.03%

Volatility

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) at 2.64%. This indicates that CU2U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CU2U.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.64%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

7.08%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

9.92%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

13.92%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

15.70%

+0.76%

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU2U.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CU2U.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

CU2U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CU2U.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


CU2U.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CU2U.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CU2U.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

CU2U.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2U.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU2U.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer