PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU2U.L achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than LGUS.L's 9.01% return.


CU2U.L

1D
-1.43%
1M
-2.71%
6M
8.23%
YTD
9.64%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
13.87%

LGUS.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.36%
6M
8.07%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CU2U.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
9.64%14.10%19.50%27.09%-20.03%27.37%20.45%31.60%-11.20%
LGUS.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.01%17.98%25.09%28.66%-20.46%27.91%21.16%30.91%-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CU2U.L and LGUS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.95

The correlation between CU2U.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU2U.L
CU2U.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUS.L
LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CU2U.LLGUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.30

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

8.84

-1.51

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU2U.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU2U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2U.L and LGUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CU2U.LLGUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-34.26%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-8.58%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-19.46%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.42%

-25.64%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-1.69%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.29%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.23%

+0.63%

Volatility

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that CU2U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CU2U.LLGUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.15%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

9.50%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

12.53%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.52%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

18.10%

-1.67%

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU2U.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CU2U.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CU2U.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CU2U.L and LGUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CU2U.L.

CU2U.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2U.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU2U.L and LGUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer