CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L
CU2U.L (Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD) and FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CU2U.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while FUSD.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CU2U.L returned 11.99%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for FUSD.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CU2U.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUSD.L.
Performance
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU2U.L achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than FUSD.L's 7.97% return.
CU2U.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
FUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU2U.L Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD | 12.35% | 14.10% | 19.50% | 27.09% | -20.03% | 27.37% | 20.45% | 31.60% | -6.43% | 16.05% |
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 7.97% | 16.45% | 17.47% | 18.48% | -10.54% | 26.22% | 11.82% | 31.47% | -4.52% | 16.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU2U.L and FUSD.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CU2U.L and FUSD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Healthcare
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Financial Services
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Communication Services
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Industrials
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Consumer Defensive
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Energy
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Real Estate
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Utilities
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Basic Materials
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU2U.L
FUSD.L
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CU2U.L | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.97 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 12.99 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CU2U.L | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.30 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.86 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU2U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FUSD.L drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2U.L and FUSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU2U.L | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -35.82% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -7.94% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -17.61% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.42% | -19.41% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -3.88% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.82% | +0.99% |
Volatility
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) at 2.91%. This indicates that CU2U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU2U.L | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 2.91% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 7.69% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 10.29% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 14.61% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 15.78% | +0.68% |
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU2U.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CU2U.L vs. FUSD.L - Dividend Comparison
CU2U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU2U.L Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.85% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.95% | 2.19% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CU2U.L and FUSD.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CU2U.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CU2U.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSD.L.
CU2U.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2U.L and 0.25% for FUSD.L.
Find the right allocation for CU2U.L and FUSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer