CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L
CU2G.L (Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CU2G.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CU2G.L returned 15.40%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for MEUD.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CU2G.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.
Performance
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU2G.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CU2G.L has outperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 15.40%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.
CU2G.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
MEUD.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU2G.L Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD | 12.15% | 6.37% | 21.31% | 20.11% | -10.63% | 29.15% | 16.42% | 26.58% | -0.32% | 10.75% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 5.97% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU2G.L and MEUD.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CU2G.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Healthcare
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Financial Services
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Communication Services
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Industrials
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Defensive
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Energy
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Real Estate
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Utilities
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Basic Materials
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU2G.L
MEUD.L
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CU2G.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.84 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 6.68 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CU2G.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.60 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.70 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.69 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.59 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU2G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2G.L and MEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU2G.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -28.57% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | -10.53% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.81% | -12.61% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.81% | -17.09% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.96% | -28.57% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.90% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -4.17% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.91% | -0.15% |
Volatility
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) is 3.21%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that CU2G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU2G.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 4.20% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.38% | 10.19% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 12.13% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 13.94% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 14.92% | +0.84% |
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU2G.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CU2G.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CU2G.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CU2G.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CU2G.L.
CU2G.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. CU2G.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2G.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for CU2G.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer