PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CU2G.L is traded in GBp, while HIUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HIUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU2G.L achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than HIUS.L's 27.34% return.


CU2G.L

1D
0.42%
1M
7.90%
YTD
12.62%
6M
13.09%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
15.30%

HIUS.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
14.96%
YTD
27.34%
6M
27.08%
1Y
49.89%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CU2G.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
12.62%6.37%21.31%20.11%-4.27%
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
27.34%10.31%9.54%23.06%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CU2G.L and HIUS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2022

0.90

The correlation between CU2G.L and HIUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU2G.L
CU2G.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CU2G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU2G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU2G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CU2G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU2G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HIUS.L
HIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CU2G.LHIUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.60

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

7.20

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

20.58

-10.04

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU2G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU2G.L and HIUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CU2G.LHIUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

3.44

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.18

-0.17

Drawdowns

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU2G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HIUS.L drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2G.L and HIUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CU2G.LHIUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-25.20%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-6.86%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-25.20%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-3.87%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.41%

+0.35%

Volatility

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) is 3.20%, while HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that CU2G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CU2G.LHIUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

5.46%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

10.84%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

14.36%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.67%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

15.67%

+0.08%

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU2G.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HIUS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CU2G.L vs. HIUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CU2G.L nor HIUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CU2G.L and HIUS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CU2G.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CU2G.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HIUS.L.

CU2G.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HIUS.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic ESG Universal Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2G.L and 0.30% for HIUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU2G.L and HIUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer