CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CU2G.L (Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD) and CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Amundi and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CU2G.L returned 15.40%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for CAPU.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CU2G.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPU.L.

Performance

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU2G.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CU2G.L has outperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 15.40%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.28% annualized return.

CU2G.L

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 12.93%
• 1Y: 28.55%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 15.40%

CAPU.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: -1.17%
• 6M: -0.95%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 9.20%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: 14.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CU2G.L Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD	12.15%	6.37%	21.31%	20.11%	-10.63%	29.15%	16.42%	26.58%	-0.32%	10.75%
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust	-1.17%	1.73%	17.90%	21.81%	-5.24%	29.62%	14.24%	26.06%	1.32%	9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CU2G.L and CAPU.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between CU2G.L and CAPU.L has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CU2G.L

CU2G.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
CU2G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CU2G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CU2G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CU2G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CU2G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CAPU.L

CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CU2G.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	0.70	+1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.02	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.12	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	0.83	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.34	2.51	+7.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU2G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU2G.L and CAPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CU2G.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	0.70	+1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.70	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	0.92	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.89	+0.11

Drawdowns

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU2G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, roughly equal to the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU2G.L and CAPU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CU2G.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-26.39%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-7.76%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.81%	-15.35%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.81%	-15.35%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.96%	-26.39%	+0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-5.43%	+5.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-3.57%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.59%	+0.17%

Volatility

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2G.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CU2G.L	CAPU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	3.07%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	7.04%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	9.26%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	13.57%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	15.60%	+0.16%

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU2G.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CU2G.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CU2G.L nor CAPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CU2G.L and CAPU.L in my portfolio?

CU2G.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CU2G.L or CAPU.L?

On fees, CU2G.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CU2G.L or CAPU.L?

CU2G.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

What is the main difference between CU2G.L and CAPU.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CU2G.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.