PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CU1.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CU1.L vs. USDV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CU1.L (iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CU1.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CU1.L returned 15.88%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CU1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.

Performance

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CU1.L is traded in GBp, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CU1.L achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CU1.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 15.88%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.

CU1.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.61%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.25%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
15.88%

USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.76%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.16%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CU1.L
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		10.45%9.22%27.38%20.66%-10.62%28.72%16.30%26.24%-0.40%10.55%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis		7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%1.49%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CU1.L and USDV.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between CU1.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CU1.L
USDV.L

Technology

35.4%
8.9%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.5%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
5.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
6.2%

Industrials

8.5%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
17.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.5%

Utilities

2.3%
14.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.4%

Technology

CU1.L
35.4%
USDV.L
8.9%

Financial Services

CU1.L
11.6%
USDV.L
11.5%

Communication Services

CU1.L
11.3%
USDV.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CU1.L
10.2%
USDV.L
5.2%

Healthcare

CU1.L
8.6%
USDV.L
6.2%

Industrials

CU1.L
8.5%
USDV.L
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

CU1.L
4.8%
USDV.L
17.0%

Energy

CU1.L
3.6%
USDV.L
4.5%

Utilities

CU1.L
2.3%
USDV.L
14.8%

Real Estate

CU1.L
1.9%
USDV.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

CU1.L
1.8%
USDV.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis

Often compared with CU1.L:
CU1.L vs. XDUS.LCU1.L vs. CSP1.LCU1.L vs. QQQCU1.L vs. VUGCU1.L vs. LGUG.LCU1.L vs. ISDU.LCU1.L vs. SPXL
Often compared with USDV.L:
USDV.L vs. SCHDUSDV.L vs. UDVD.LUSDV.L vs. SPYUSDV.L vs. VOOUSDV.L vs. XUHY.LUSDV.L vs. QDIVUSDV.L vs. VUAA.L

Return for Risk

CU1.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CU1.L
CU1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CU1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CU1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CU1.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.70
1.44

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.62
2.15

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.12

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

5.42

+7.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CU1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CU1.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CU1.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.44

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.53

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.64

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.84

+0.27

Drawdowns

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CU1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU1.L and USDV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CU1.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.87%

-27.80%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-6.60%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-16.30%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-16.30%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.87%

-27.80%

+1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-3.68%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-4.14%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.58%

-0.36%

Volatility

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CU1.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.53%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

7.19%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

9.69%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

12.78%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

15.33%

+0.43%

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CU1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CU1.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

CU1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CU1.L
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis		2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CU1.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CU1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CU1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

CU1.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CU1.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CU1.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer