CU1.L vs. FLXK.L
CU1.L (iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CU1.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLXK.L is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CU1.L returned 12.81%/yr vs 15.73%/yr for FLXK.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CU1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CU1.L is traded in GBp, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU1.L achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 72.16% return.
CU1.L
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -23.34%
- 6M
- 49.24%
- YTD
- 72.16%
- 1Y
- 136.47%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU1.L iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.92% | 9.22% | 27.38% | 20.66% | -10.62% | 28.72% | 16.30% | 12.65% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 72.16% | 80.91% | -20.26% | 14.73% | -19.45% | -5.96% | 42.98% | 8.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU1.L and FLXK.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU1.L
FLXK.L
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CU1.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 5.03 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 17.21 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU1.L drawdown since its inception was -98.42%, which is greater than FLXK.L's maximum drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU1.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU1.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.42% | -41.70% | -56.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -26.99% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -28.10% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -37.31% | +15.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -26.99% | +25.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -17.72% | +13.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 7.90% | -5.63% |
Volatility
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) is 3.12%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 18.55%. This indicates that CU1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU1.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 18.55% | -15.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 40.42% | -32.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 43.95% | -32.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 27.96% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 28.13% | -9.75% |
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CU1.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CU1.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CU1.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CU1.L.
CU1.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLXK.L is South Korea Equities. CU1.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CU1.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for CU1.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer