CU1.L vs. BBUD.L
CU1.L (iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BBUD.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CU1.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while BBUD.L tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CU1.L returned 12.81%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for BBUD.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CU1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBUD.L.
Performance
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CU1.L is traded in GBp, while BBUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BBUD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CU1.L achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than BBUD.L's 10.61% return.
CU1.L
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
BBUD.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU1.L iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.92% | 9.22% | 27.38% | 20.66% | -10.62% | 28.72% | 16.30% | 12.13% |
BBUD.L JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) | 10.61% | 9.05% | 27.31% | 21.26% | -10.43% | 28.84% | 16.63% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CU1.L and BBUD.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CU1.L and BBUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CU1.L
BBUD.L
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CU1.L | BBUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.80 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 9.09 | -0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CU1.L drawdown since its inception was -98.42%, which is greater than BBUD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CU1.L and BBUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CU1.L | BBUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.42% | -26.30% | -72.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -7.71% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -21.32% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -21.32% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.43% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -3.72% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.38% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CU1.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CU1.L | BBUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.21% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 9.56% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 12.45% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 15.70% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 17.15% | +1.23% |
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CU1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUD.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CU1.L vs. BBUD.L - Dividend Comparison
CU1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUD.L JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) | 1.10% | 1.10% | 1.01% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.95% | 1.37% | 0.74% |
CU1.L iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CU1.L and BBUD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CU1.L.
CU1.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while BBUD.L tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CU1.L and 0.05% for BBUD.L.
Find the right allocation for CU1.L and BBUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer