PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTTLX vs. TFCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTTLX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than TFCYX's 0.92% return.


CTTLX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
1.90%

TFCYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.15%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTTLX
Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund
1.69%5.18%1.93%5.00%-8.48%0.20%4.38%7.45%0.54%5.00%
TFCYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund
0.92%2.71%3.24%2.77%0.72%0.10%0.46%1.40%1.25%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CTTLX and TFCYX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTTLX vs. TFCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTTLX
CTTLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CTTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CTTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TFCYX
TFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTTLXTFCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

5.87

-4.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

24.70

-22.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

75.31

-66.31

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTTLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the TFCYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTTLX and TFCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTTLXTFCYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

3.28

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.70

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.66

-0.63

Drawdowns

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTTLX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, which is greater than TFCYX's maximum drawdown of -1.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTTLX and TFCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTTLXTFCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-1.10%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-0.10%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.67%

-1.10%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-1.10%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-0.02%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.03%

+0.82%

Volatility

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX) at 0.19%. This indicates that CTTLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTTLXTFCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.19%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

0.53%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

0.75%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

1.22%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

0.91%

+2.92%

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTTLX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TFCYX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTTLX vs. TFCYX - Dividend Comparison

CTTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than TFCYX's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTTLX
Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund
3.14%3.99%3.29%2.21%1.43%1.04%1.43%2.46%2.44%2.57%2.71%2.62%
TFCYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund
2.42%2.68%3.19%2.63%0.72%0.00%0.46%1.39%1.24%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTTLX and TFCYX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTTLX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to TFCYX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTTLX dropped -13.21% vs TFCYX's -1.10%.

TFCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTTLX and TFCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer