CTTLX vs. CISIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CTTLX (Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund) and CISIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund) are both mutual funds - CTTLX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CISIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CTTLX returned 1.89%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for CISIX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CTTLX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CISIX.

Performance

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTTLX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CISIX's 12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CTTLX has underperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.

CTTLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 7.42%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: 1.89%

CISIX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 5.77%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 6M: 13.06%
• 1Y: 30.78%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 12.97%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTTLX Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund	1.49%	5.18%	1.93%	5.00%	-8.48%	0.20%	4.38%	7.45%	0.54%	5.00%
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	12.83%	15.90%	24.14%	27.27%	-21.68%	25.63%	26.12%	32.81%	-4.08%	21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CTTLX and CISIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000	-0.08

The correlation between CTTLX and CISIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CTTLX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTTLX

CTTLX Risk / Return Rank: 69
CTTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CTTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CTTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CTTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CTTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CISIX

CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTTLX	CISIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.50	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	3.43	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.44	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.19	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	14.73	-6.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTTLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTTLX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTTLX	CISIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.50	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.73	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.84	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.39	+0.64

Drawdowns

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTTLX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTTLX and CISIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTTLX	CISIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-59.36%	+46.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.94%	-9.72%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.67%	-19.94%	+14.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.21%	-27.37%	+14.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.21%	-32.82%	+19.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-14.29%	+12.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	2.11%	-1.26%

Volatility

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund (CTTLX) is 1.07%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that CTTLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTTLX	CISIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	3.33%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.04%	9.67%	-7.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	12.53%	-9.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	17.78%	-14.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.83%	18.57%	-14.74%

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTTLX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CISIX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTTLX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CTTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than CISIX's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	4.78%	5.39%	1.77%	1.02%	1.17%	1.02%	0.94%	1.14%	4.33%	2.41%	3.77%	7.62%
CTTLX Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund	3.15%	3.99%	3.29%	2.21%	1.43%	1.04%	1.43%	2.46%	2.44%	2.57%	2.71%	2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTTLX and CISIX in my portfolio?

CTTLX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTTLX or CISIX?

CISIX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to CTTLX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTTLX dropped -13.21% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTTLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.