PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTSIX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTSIX achieves a 35.59% return, which is significantly higher than DSCIX's 21.19% return.


CTSIX

1D
2.87%
1M
11.15%
YTD
35.59%
6M
35.33%
1Y
68.24%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*

DSCIX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.77%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.93%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
35.59%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
21.19%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CTSIX and DSCIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019

0.84

The correlation between CTSIX and DSCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTSIX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTSIXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

6.66

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.22

23.94

-0.72

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTSIX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTSIXDSCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.37

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Drawdowns

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTSIX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than DSCIX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTSIX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTSIXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.83%

-47.60%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-7.08%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-32.94%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.60%

-32.94%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-9.87%

-10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.97%

+1.03%

Volatility

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a higher volatility of 9.40% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.53%. This indicates that CTSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTSIXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.40%

4.53%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.29%

12.06%

+9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.70%

17.19%

+10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.00%

22.18%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.78%

23.25%

+6.53%

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTSIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTSIX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.96%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTSIX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to DSCIX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTSIX dropped -50.83% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTSIX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer