PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIGX vs. OEGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A (OEGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIGX achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than OEGAX's 28.34% return.


CTIGX

1D
1.38%
1M
4.36%
YTD
30.42%
6M
26.29%
1Y
57.77%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*

OEGAX

1D
1.53%
1M
5.28%
YTD
28.34%
6M
25.35%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
30.42%21.21%44.09%12.26%-34.88%7.64%58.94%-3.80%
OEGAX
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
28.34%4.85%24.09%12.96%-31.09%18.44%40.12%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CTIGX and OEGAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019

0.91

The correlation between CTIGX and OEGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTIGX vs. OEGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTIGX
CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

OEGAX
OEGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OEGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
OEGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A (OEGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTIGXOEGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

3.77

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.96

13.44

+6.52

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the OEGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTIGX and OEGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.26%, smaller than the maximum OEGAX drawdown of -53.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIGX and OEGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIGXOEGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.26%

-53.73%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-10.16%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-28.64%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.26%

-39.38%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-12.75%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.73%

+0.30%

Volatility

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A (OEGAX) at 7.60%. This indicates that CTIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OEGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTIGXOEGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.38%

7.60%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

17.81%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

22.01%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.26%

22.37%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.21%

22.20%

+7.01%

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than OEGAX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTIGX vs. OEGAX - Dividend Comparison

CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than OEGAX's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
3.52%4.59%2.80%0.00%0.00%11.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OEGAX
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
7.09%9.10%4.95%0.00%0.00%18.94%3.55%4.40%10.54%9.32%0.89%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTIGX and OEGAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTIGX has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to OEGAX (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIGX dropped -46.26% vs OEGAX's -53.73%.

CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTIGX and OEGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer