PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIGX vs. CPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
-5.11%21.21%44.09%12.26%-34.88%7.64%58.94%-3.80%
CPLIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund
-4.56%9.89%8.89%8.04%-0.96%7.52%19.81%-2.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIGX achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than CPLIX's -4.56% return.


CTIGX

1D
-3.45%
1M
-9.97%
YTD
-5.11%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

CPLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-4.56%
6M
-5.82%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPLIX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CTIGX vs. CPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTIGX
CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CPLIX
CPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTIGXCPLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.39

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

0.65

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

0.31

+2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.43

1.00

+8.43

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the CPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTIGX and CPLIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTIGXCPLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.39

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.26

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.46

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CTIGX and CPLIX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Dividend Comparison

CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than CPLIX's 5.79% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
4.84%4.59%2.80%0.00%0.00%11.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CPLIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund
5.79%5.52%6.90%1.86%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.43%3.88%1.21%0.85%

Drawdowns

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.26%, which is greater than CPLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIGX and CPLIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIGXCPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.26%

-33.71%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-8.73%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.26%

-18.28%

-27.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.56%

-8.73%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-4.68%

-14.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.71%

+0.48%

Volatility

CTIGX vs. CPLIX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX) at 2.87%. This indicates that CTIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CTIGXCPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

2.87%

+8.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.05%

6.07%

+13.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.24%

9.38%

+18.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.74%

12.27%

+14.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.03%

15.26%

+13.77%