CTIGX vs. BBMIX
CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) and BBMIX (BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CTIGX returned 10.68%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for BBMIX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTIGX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BBMIX.
Performance
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTIGX achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than BBMIX's 2.86% return.
CTIGX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 30.42%
- 6M
- 26.29%
- 1Y
- 57.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BBMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- -1.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 30.42% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.50% |
BBMIX BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund | 2.86% | -6.45% | 11.41% | 26.01% | -24.76% | 13.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIGX and BBMIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2021 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CTIGX and BBMIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTIGX vs. BBMIX — Risk / Return Rank
CTIGX
BBMIX
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTIGX | BBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.01 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | -0.01 | +5.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.96 | -0.02 | +19.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.26%, which is greater than BBMIX's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIGX and BBMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIGX | BBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.26% | -28.90% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -8.89% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -23.79% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.26% | -28.90% | -17.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.28% | +11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -10.51% | -7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 5.30% | -2.27% |
Volatility
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CTIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTIGX | BBMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 0.00% | +10.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.85% | 6.04% | +15.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.71% | 11.14% | +16.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 19.70% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 19.57% | +9.64% |
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTIGX vs. BBMIX - Dividend Comparison
CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while BBMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMIX BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 3.52% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTIGX and BBMIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTIGX has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to BBMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIGX dropped -46.26% vs BBMIX's -28.90%.
CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTIGX and BBMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer