PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIGX vs. ADNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIGX achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than ADNPX's 3.39% return.


CTIGX

1D
1.38%
1M
4.36%
YTD
30.42%
6M
26.29%
1Y
57.77%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*

ADNPX

1D
-2.25%
1M
3.34%
YTD
3.39%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
-7.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
30.42%21.21%44.09%12.26%-34.88%7.64%58.94%-3.80%
ADNPX
American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund
3.39%35.66%8.19%67.46%-66.37%-22.90%147.19%1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CTIGX and ADNPX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019

0.80

The correlation between CTIGX and ADNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTIGX vs. ADNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTIGX
CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ADNPX
ADNPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ADNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ADNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) and American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTIGXADNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

0.59

+4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.96

1.33

+18.63

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the ADNPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTIGX and ADNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIGX drawdown since its inception was -46.26%, smaller than the maximum ADNPX drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIGX and ADNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIGXADNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.26%

-79.98%

+33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-30.04%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-38.99%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.26%

-76.39%

+30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-46.44%

+46.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-34.77%

+16.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

13.29%

-10.26%

Volatility

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) is 10.38%, while American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that CTIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTIGXADNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.38%

12.98%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

26.81%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

35.30%

-7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.26%

45.24%

-17.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.21%

39.69%

-10.48%

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ADNPX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTIGX vs. ADNPX - Dividend Comparison

CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while ADNPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADNPX
American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.67%31.49%0.39%3.31%6.56%3.64%
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
3.52%4.59%2.80%0.00%0.00%11.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTIGX and ADNPX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADNPX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to CTIGX (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIGX dropped -46.26% vs ADNPX's -79.98%.

CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTIGX and ADNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer