CTHRX vs. FSELX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CTHRX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both mutual funds - CTHRX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while FSELX is a Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, CTHRX returned 23.74%/yr vs 36.15%/yr for FSELX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CTHRX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.

Performance

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTHRX achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 54.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CTHRX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 23.74%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.15% annualized return.

CTHRX

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -4.12%
• 6M: 18.15%
• YTD: 21.35%
• 1Y: 35.08%
• 3Y*: 29.32%
• 5Y*: 17.76%
• 10Y*: 23.74%

FSELX

• 1D: -4.61%
• 1M: -12.96%
• 6M: 41.26%
• YTD: 54.72%
• 1Y: 90.44%
• 3Y*: 52.58%
• 5Y*: 41.53%
• 10Y*: 36.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTHRX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class	21.35%	25.15%	31.79%	56.93%	-34.59%	23.10%	49.92%	44.27%	-1.20%	43.52%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	54.72%	52.17%	49.68%	78.49%	-35.27%	59.16%	44.33%	64.50%	-12.01%	34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CTHRX and FSELX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012	0.88

The correlation between CTHRX and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CTHRX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTHRX

CTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 45
CTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
CTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FSELX

FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTHRX	FSELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.37	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.72	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	5.11	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.56	18.52	-9.96

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTHRX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTHRX and FSELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTHRX	FSELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.40%	-82.54%	+43.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-18.19%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-36.31%	+9.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.40%	-46.37%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.40%	-46.37%	+6.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.22%	-18.19%	+9.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-28.64%	+22.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	5.01%	-0.75%

Volatility

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) is 11.00%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 17.98%. This indicates that CTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTHRX	FSELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.00%	17.98%	-6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.55%	32.84%	-11.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.20%	39.21%	-14.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.71%	40.14%	-13.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.16%	35.66%	-10.50%

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTHRX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTHRX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

CTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSELX's 10.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTHRX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class	2.48%	3.01%	0.99%	2.18%	3.28%	4.16%	1.01%	2.39%	5.85%	3.60%	0.35%	1.71%
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio	10.59%	11.11%	7.97%	7.20%	6.69%	6.99%	8.13%	3.36%	26.80%	14.44%	3.82%	15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTHRX and FSELX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CTHRX and FSELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CTHRX or FSELX?

FSELX has higher volatility (17.98%) compared to CTHRX (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTHRX dropped -39.40% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.