PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTHRX vs. FELIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTHRX achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly lower than FELIX's 84.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CTHRX has underperformed FELIX with an annualized return of 25.13%, while FELIX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.61% annualized return.


CTHRX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.03%
YTD
32.22%
6M
31.35%
1Y
62.30%
3Y*
36.48%
5Y*
21.32%
10Y*
25.13%

FELIX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.21%
YTD
84.99%
6M
82.86%
1Y
170.17%
3Y*
63.90%
5Y*
43.93%
10Y*
37.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTHRX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class
32.22%25.15%31.79%56.93%-34.59%23.10%49.92%44.27%-1.20%43.52%
FELIX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I
84.99%45.25%44.10%75.49%-34.88%57.89%44.02%64.21%-12.52%34.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CTHRX and FELIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.88

The correlation between CTHRX and FELIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTHRX vs. FELIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTHRX
CTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FELIX
FELIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTHRXFELIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.73

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

12.24

-7.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

47.66

-30.81

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is lower than the FELIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTHRX and FELIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTHRXFELIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

5.51

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.15

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

1.09

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.48

+0.59

Drawdowns

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTHRX drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum FELIX drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTHRX and FELIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTHRXFELIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-71.17%

+31.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-14.65%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-36.40%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.40%

-46.02%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

-46.02%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-21.14%

+15.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

3.75%

+0.07%

Volatility

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class (CTHRX) is 6.37%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that CTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTHRXFELIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

11.90%

-5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

25.31%

-8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

32.52%

-11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.97%

38.35%

-12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

34.69%

-9.84%

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTHRX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FELIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTHRX vs. FELIX - Dividend Comparison

CTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than FELIX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTHRX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Institutional 2 Class
2.28%3.01%0.99%2.18%3.28%4.16%1.01%2.39%5.85%3.60%0.35%1.71%
FELIX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I
3.52%6.51%6.44%3.15%3.09%4.14%4.43%1.04%19.34%9.50%0.55%10.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTHRX and FELIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELIX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to CTHRX (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTHRX dropped -39.40% vs FELIX's -71.17%.

FELIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.51 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTHRX and FELIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer