CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L
CTEK.L (Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HTWG.L (L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - CTEK.L tracks the Indxx Global CleanTech v2 Index while HTWG.L tracks the Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEK.L returned -5.57%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for HTWG.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CTEK.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HTWG.L.
Performance
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CTEK.L is traded in USD, while HTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEK.L achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than HTWG.L's 31.05% return.
CTEK.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -13.91%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 48.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTWG.L
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- YTD
- 31.05%
- 1Y
- 61.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEK.L Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.69% | 53.41% | -33.55% | -21.76% | -17.31% | -19.38% |
HTWG.L L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF | 31.05% | 40.54% | -8.27% | -3.67% | -37.07% | -11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEK.L and HTWG.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CTEK.L and HTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CTEK.L
HTWG.L
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) and L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTEK.L | HTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.96 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 8.25 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than HTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEK.L and HTWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEK.L | HTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -67.81% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.44% | -20.72% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.73% | -32.66% | -31.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.61% | -29.91% | -10.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.62% | -47.93% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 7.46% | +1.88% |
Volatility
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) at 11.15%. This indicates that CTEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEK.L | HTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 11.15% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.55% | 22.82% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.49% | 31.93% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 29.04% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 29.09% | +7.86% |
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEK.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HTWG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEK.L vs. HTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CTEK.L nor HTWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEK.L and HTWG.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CTEK.L.
CTEK.L tracks Indxx Global CleanTech v2 Index, while HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEK.L and 0.49% for HTWG.L.
Find the right allocation for CTEK.L and HTWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer