PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEF vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEF vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 40.36% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


CTEF

1D
0.97%
1M
16.38%
YTD
40.36%
6M
37.32%
1Y
87.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
40.36%33.10%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and IBID is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEF vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEF
CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTEFIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.75

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.86

8.22

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.12

30.99

-3.87

CTEF vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEF Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is comparable to the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEF and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEFIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-1.28%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-0.49%

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-0.22%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

0.13%

+3.10%

Volatility

CTEF vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that CTEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEFIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

0.35%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

0.86%

+18.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

1.23%

+21.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

2.24%

+20.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

2.24%

+20.20%

CTEF vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEF vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.05%0.08%0.00%0.00%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEF and IBID have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTEF has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEF dropped -15.00% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 87.37% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 87.37% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.05% for CTEF.

CTEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Castellan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.10% for IBID.

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEF and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer