CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L
CT2B.L (iShares Smart City Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CT2B.L is a Building & Construction fund tracking the STOXX Global Smart City Infrastructure Index, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CT2B.L returned 8.13%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CT2B.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CT2B.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CT2B.L achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.00% return.
CT2B.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CT2B.L iShares Smart City Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.13% | 11.49% | 11.84% | 12.99% | -12.67% | -9.93% | 23.84% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.00% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 17.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CT2B.L and CSP1.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CT2B.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
CT2B.L
CSP1.L
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Smart City Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CT2B.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CT2B.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.91 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 10.45 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CT2B.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CT2B.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CT2B.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -25.48% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -7.12% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -20.77% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -20.77% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.42% | -1.06% | -6.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -3.64% | -9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 1.99% | +1.00% |
Volatility
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Smart City Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CT2B.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.87%. This indicates that CT2B.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CT2B.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 2.87% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 7.83% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 11.08% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 20.05% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 18.33% | +2.98% |
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CT2B.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CT2B.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
CT2B.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CT2B.L iShares Smart City Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.90% | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CT2B.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CT2B.L.
CT2B.L is categorized as Building & Construction, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. CT2B.L tracks STOXX Global Smart City Infrastructure Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CT2B.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for CT2B.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer