CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) and WTER.DE (WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both REIT funds - CSYZ.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green while WTER.DE tracks the CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSYZ.DE returned 3.23%/yr vs 16.33%/yr for WTER.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSYZ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WTER.DE.

Performance

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYZ.DE achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than WTER.DE's 23.54% return.

CSYZ.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: —

WTER.DE

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: 23.54%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 44.53%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	7.36%	-5.02%	2.47%	4.08%	-14.16%
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist	23.54%	17.11%	0.49%	9.28%	-17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSYZ.DE

CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

WTER.DE

WTER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
WTER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
WTER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WTER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
WTER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
WTER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSYZ.DE	WTER.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	2.24	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	3.05	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.37	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	3.28	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	8.88	-6.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the WTER.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSYZ.DE	WTER.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	2.24	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.36	-0.10

Drawdowns

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum WTER.DE drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSYZ.DE	WTER.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-32.93%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-13.49%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-23.54%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.10%	-2.35%	-12.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.84%	-16.08%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	5.00%	-2.18%

Volatility

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) is 2.84%, while WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that CSYZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTER.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSYZ.DE	WTER.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	6.93%	-4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	14.11%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	19.85%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	17.61%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	17.61%	-2.39%

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYZ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WTER.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSYZ.DE vs. WTER.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than WTER.DE's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	1.01%	1.32%	0.00%	0.76%	3.39%	0.21%
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.11%	1.59%	1.65%	1.14%	0.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE in my portfolio?

CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSYZ.DE or WTER.DE?

On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSYZ.DE or WTER.DE?

CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WTER.DE.

What is the main difference between CSYZ.DE and WTER.DE?

CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green, while WTER.DE tracks CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSYZ.DE and 0.45% for WTER.DE.