PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYZ.DE achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPYJ.DE's 8.14% return.


CSYZ.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
7.36%
6M
6.90%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*

SPYJ.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
8.14%
6M
7.45%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
7.36%-5.02%2.47%4.08%-19.53%36.67%5.48%
SPYJ.DE
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
8.14%-2.34%4.88%7.77%-20.64%41.31%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.95

The correlation between CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSYZ.DE
CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYJ.DE
SPYJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPYJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSYZ.DESPYJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.46

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

4.40

-2.12

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the SPYJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSYZ.DESPYJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.90

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.15

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.06

Drawdowns

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum SPYJ.DE drawdown of -42.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSYZ.DESPYJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-42.92%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-6.95%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-20.29%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.21%

-30.71%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-7.72%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-11.10%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.31%

+0.51%

Volatility

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) is 2.84%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (SPYJ.DE) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that CSYZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSYZ.DESPYJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

3.15%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

8.50%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

11.29%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.11%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.96%

-1.74%

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYZ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYJ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSYZ.DE vs. SPYJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SPYJ.DE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
1.01%1.32%0.00%0.76%3.39%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYJ.DE
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.57%2.80%2.70%2.67%2.91%1.76%2.70%3.16%4.36%4.02%2.53%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SPYJ.DE.

CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green, while SPYJ.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSYZ.DE and 0.40% for SPYJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSYZ.DE and SPYJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer