CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE
CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) and ASRM.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - CSYZ.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green while ASRM.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Both are passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSYZ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ASRM.DE.
Performance
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CSYZ.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ASRM.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD | 7.36% | -5.02% | 2.47% | 4.08% | -19.53% | 36.67% | 5.48% |
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -78.40% | -3.99% | -3.83% | 0.89% | -15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSYZ.DE and ASRM.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSYZ.DE
ASRM.DE
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSYZ.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSYZ.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSYZ.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSYZ.DE | ASRM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | — | — |
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSYZ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSYZ.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison
CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD | 1.01% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 3.39% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSYZ.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ASRM.DE.
CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSYZ.DE and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSYZ.DE and ASRM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer