CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE
CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and SXR0.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility while SXR0.DE tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CSY9.DE returned 9.93% vs 4.40% for SXR0.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSY9.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SXR0.DE.
Performance
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY9.DE achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than SXR0.DE's 1.91% return.
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXR0.DE
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 5.89% | -0.67% | 3.39% |
SXR0.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 1.91% | 7.02% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY9.DE and SXR0.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CSY9.DE and SXR0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSY9.DE
SXR0.DE
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SXR0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSY9.DE | SXR0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.83 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 1.78 | +4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY9.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum SXR0.DE drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY9.DE and SXR0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY9.DE | SXR0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -27.73% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | -5.26% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -2.17% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -3.95% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 2.46% | -0.88% |
Volatility
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) is 2.39%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SXR0.DE) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that CSY9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXR0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY9.DE | SXR0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 2.70% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.69% | 5.92% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 8.19% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 10.15% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 11.60% | -0.72% |
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY9.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR0.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSY9.DE vs. SXR0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY9.DE nor SXR0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY9.DE and SXR0.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SXR0.DE.
CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility, while SXR0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CSY9.DE and 0.35% for SXR0.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSY9.DE and SXR0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer