PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSY9.DE achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than IS3R.DE's 22.51% return.


CSY9.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.99%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.34%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

IS3R.DE

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.60%
YTD
22.51%
6M
23.56%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSY9.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD
3.19%-0.67%16.05%5.76%-5.25%23.30%2.67%
IS3R.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.51%8.37%37.95%8.09%-13.60%24.50%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3R.DE
IS3R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSY9.DEIS3R.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.34

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

3.48

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

13.30

-11.76

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSY9.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.84

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.84

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.85

-0.24

Drawdowns

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY9.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, smaller than the maximum IS3R.DE drawdown of -30.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSY9.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-30.77%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-9.01%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-23.57%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

-23.57%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-1.01%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-5.67%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.36%

-0.36%

Volatility

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) is 2.09%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that CSY9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSY9.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

5.96%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.48%

14.33%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

17.01%

-8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

17.32%

-5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

17.23%

-5.32%

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSY9.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSY9.DE nor IS3R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CSY9.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IS3R.DE is Momentum. CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility, while IS3R.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSY9.DE and IS3R.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer