CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE
CSY8.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and EUNM.DE (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSY8.DE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while EUNM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSY8.DE returned 6.40%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for EUNM.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSY8.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EUNM.DE.
Performance
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY8.DE achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly lower than EUNM.DE's 27.21% return.
CSY8.DE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 49.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY8.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 12.89% | -2.70% | 13.60% | 12.50% | -11.53% | 31.40% | 24.77% |
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.21% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 20.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY8.DE and EUNM.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CSY8.DE and EUNM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSY8.DE
EUNM.DE
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSY8.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.50 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 4.72 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 17.07 | -5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSY8.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.78 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.39 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY8.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum EUNM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY8.DE and EUNM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY8.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -35.91% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -10.46% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.41% | -19.01% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -23.62% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.61% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -10.55% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.90% | -0.65% |
Volatility
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) is 3.95%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that CSY8.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY8.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 7.30% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 14.98% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 17.80% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 16.70% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 18.19% | +2.09% |
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSY8.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY8.DE nor EUNM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY8.DE and EUNM.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSY8.DE.
CSY8.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EUNM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. CSY8.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSY8.DE and 0.18% for EUNM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSY8.DE and EUNM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer