PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSY8.DE achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly higher than CSYZ.DE's 7.36% return.


CSY8.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
3.52%
YTD
12.89%
6M
13.27%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*

CSYZ.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
7.36%
6M
6.96%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSY8.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
12.89%-2.70%13.60%12.50%-11.53%31.40%24.77%
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
7.36%-5.02%2.47%4.08%-19.53%36.67%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.64

The correlation between CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY8.DE
CSY8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CSY8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CSYZ.DE
CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSY8.DECSYZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.10

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

0.80

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

2.28

+9.18

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSY8.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

0.57

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.00

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.26

+0.36

Drawdowns

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY8.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, roughly equal to the maximum CSYZ.DE drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSY8.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.41%

-31.21%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-8.07%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.41%

-20.14%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

-31.21%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.10%

+15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-13.84%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.82%

-0.57%

Volatility

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that CSY8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSYZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSY8.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.84%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

8.54%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

11.29%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

15.03%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

15.22%

+5.06%

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSY8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSY8.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSY8.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSY8.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
1.01%1.32%0.00%0.76%3.39%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSY8.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY8.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

CSY8.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CSYZ.DE is REIT. CSY8.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders, while CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSY8.DE and 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSY8.DE and CSYZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer