CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L
CSY2.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSY2.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSY2.DE returned 13.48%/yr vs 22.51%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSY2.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSY2.DE is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY2.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 19.31% return.
CSY2.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.36%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- 21.68%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.75%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 24.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.15%
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY2.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 11.44% | 6.30% | 30.42% | 25.14% | -16.59% | 44.53% | 12.20% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 19.31% | 9.72% | 50.98% | 55.05% | -24.67% | 45.15% | 54.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY2.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CSY2.DE and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSY2.DE
XLKQ.L
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSY2.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.05 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 5.10 | +3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY2.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY2.DE and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY2.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -40.10% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -15.78% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -30.46% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.56% | -30.46% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -7.35% | +6.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -8.02% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 6.36% | -3.75% |
Volatility
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) is 3.30%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that CSY2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSY2.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 7.38% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 16.36% | -7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 21.39% | -8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 27.00% | -10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 23.92% | -5.50% |
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSY2.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY2.DE nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSY2.DE and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
CSY2.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSY2.DE and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for CSY2.DE and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer